Visitors will compare you to Crossword Compiler, Across Lite (AcrossDown), Qxw (Quinapalus) — your copy doesn't say how you differ
Add a short "how we're different" note (a sentence, or a small comparison) addressing: Crossword Compiler, Across Lite (AcrossDown), Qxw (Quinapalus).
Why we flagged this
Alternatives a visitor would weigh, and an angle for each: - Crossword Compiler — Desktop GUI tool for manual puzzle construction; xword-pipeline automates fill generation and AI-powered clue writing end-to-end - Across Lite (AcrossDown) — Primarily a puzzle-solving and distribution format; xword-pipeline generates puzzles from scratch with constraint-solving and LLM clue creation - Qxw (Quinapalus) — Open-source fill solver but relies on manual clue authoring; xword-pipeline integrates Claude for multi-tier automated clue generation and QA The README positions xword-pipeline around its technical stack (Rust engine, Claude AI, multi-tier clues, QA gating) but does not explicitly compare it to or differentiate it from existing crossword-creation tools.